|
||
|
Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi -
We provide fast, cost effective & Hassle free solution...Click
here for details Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Adv. Tapan Choudhury) |
||
I am a Supreme Court Advocate
Formerly it was thought that the vital point of time was fertilisation, the fusior of spermatozoon and ovum, but it is now realised (although the point as not come before the courts) that this position is not maintainable, and that conception for legal purposes must be dated at earliest from implantation.
The legislation is unspecific. The abortion section does not expressly refer to conception; it speaks merely of a "miscarriage." There is, therefore, nothing to prevent the courts interpreting the word "miscarriage" in a way that takes account of customary and approved birth control practices.
After fertilization the human egg stays in the uterine tube for three days, then descends to the uterus and on about the 10th day after fertilization attaches itself to the uterine wall . ("implantation" or "nidation"). The widely-used method of birth control called the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), such as the coil or loop, works by destroying the blastocyst (the developing egg) or preventing it from implanting itself. If, therefore, conception refers to fertilization, the' IUD should be named post-conceptive rather than contraceptive. So-called oral contraceptives may also act in this way, for as well as suppressing ovulation there is evidence that they can prevent the fertilized ovum implanting or for long remaining implanted. That is certainly the mechanism of post-coital oestrogen and progesteron administration, these substances (the so-called "morning after" pill) being effective if used within 72 hours of coitus.91f these methods of birth control are abortifacient they are illegal, unless administered by a doctor with the specified opinions of two doctors and in a hospital or registered nursing home under the Abortion Act. But no one who uses or fits IUDs supposes that they are illegal or are governed by the Abortion Act.
The only way to uphold the legality of present medical practice, to make IUDs contraceptives and not abortifacients, is to say that for legal purposes conception is not complete until implantation. An advisory group established by the British Council of Churches took this line. Moreover, it has been accepted by the Department of Health and Social Security, and the Attorney General has decided that pills designed to inhibit implantation are not abortifacient and their use is not criminal. The legal argument is that the word "miscarriage" in the abortion section means the miscarriage of an implanted blastocyst.
The line of argument would uphold the legality of a universal medical practice, and would therefore provide a partial solution to immediate problems. But our birth control methods have a devastating effect upon the anti-abortionist argument that there is something magical or divine about the moment of fertilization which brings about a new "human person" whc must be fully protected by law. If all abortion is a kind of murder, it must be recognised, ir the words of Dr Colin Brewer, that uncounted thousands of human beings are slaughtered each day by widely accepted birth control devices, as well as by the pill. Those who an unwilling to denounce these forms of birth control cannot consistently argue for the prohibition of abortion from the moment of fertilization.
Even dating the prohibition of abortion from implantation does not establish the legalit" of the gel and prostaglandin preparations, now being developed, which expel the fetus at a early stage after implantation. There is an argument for interpreting the word "miscarriage to allow still a little more leeway on this question. "Miscarriage" may be interpreted to mea the miscarriage of a fetus when it has achieved a certain degree of recognisable huma organisation. In particular, those whose objection to abortion depends upon belief in the SOl may be impressed by the fact that until two weeks after conception it remains uncertai whether the egg will become twins (or quins) instead of a single person. Since theology h: never contemplated the division of the soul, this implies that the soul cannot enter the boc for at least a fortnight after conception. So this argument takes us back to "media animation."
mytarun wrote 425 Days Ago (neutral) 0What is meant by "the mental health of the pregnant woman"?
There is no case-law, but the phrase is capable of a wide interpretation.
Narrowly interpreted, it may require the doctor to fear that the patient will suffer from what is commonly called a mental illness, whether a psychosis or severe neurosis. This may include a depressive psychosis, and the British Medical Association recognises that termination may properly be advised on account of a "reactive depression," which is a pathological state of hopeless despair resulting from circumstances.6 If the question is one of mental illness, the natural course would be to call in a psychiatrist, a specialist in mental disorder.
But "mental health" is susceptible of a wider meaning. The definition of health advanced by the World Health Organization is that it is "the state of complete mental, physical and social well-being, and not merely an absence of disease or infirmity." Gynecologists who take this broad view do not insist upon a psychiatric opinion, but are ready to act on their own opinion of the case, backed by the family doctor.
0 pointsmytarun wrote 425 Days Ago (neutral) 0Isn't the fetal ground abominably vague?
The physician must decide whether there is a "substantial" risk that the child if born would be "seriously" handicapped. Advances in knowledge and medical skills make it more and more possible to attach a precise mathematical weight to the chance of the fetus being affected by genetic defects or by what happens to it in the womb. But the doctor still has to decide whether the case is sufficiently grave to justify termination. He may, of course, take the view that a relatively low risk justifies termination if the risk is of a relatively serious handicap: in common sense, the two factors are inversely related. Even when the doctor thinks that the "fetal indication" is not itself sufficiently present, the fact that the patient is extremely depressed by worry that the child may be affected can itself be a reason for termination on the health ground.
The health grounds subdivide in relation to the health of the woman and the health of existing children of her family.0 points









